For those who are considering using debt to make your next big ticket purchase, think again! Just found a video from the Financial Post, showing you just how much the cost of debt really is. The problem is, financial institutions/retailers will implement all these tricks like introductory rates, smaller minimum payments, and even tell you that you don't have to pay for the first X number of months just to make a sale. What they don't make obvious, is the fact that the interest on the principal you owe is being compounded and you're paying a lot more interest than you have to because of the smaller minimum payments! Those plans sound more attractive than they really are.
APR% rates are frequently advertised but most will not show you the effective annual rate nor the sample interest calculations. To demonstrate how costly these payment plans can be, here's a video with numbers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FGCAKyuXR6A
We all use debt every now and then, in varying amounts...hopefully neither of us will ever have to use those ridiculous minimum payment plans! The only way I would say use it, is if you actually have the money to make the purchase immediately but you are choosing to borrow because you are fairly certain that you can make more with your investments than the interest you are paying.
-TT
Does number crunching give you headaches? Does planning your future make you sprint to the freezer looking for Ben & Jerry? Not to fear, for I am here. The primary purpose of this blog is to provide you with miscellaneous tips about anything to do with Finances. Disclaimer: This website is not intended to replace proper financial advisory from a certified professional. Follow the tips at your own risk, as there may be personal opinions and more than one way of accomplishing something.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Friday, July 12, 2013
Fuel & Tires - Round And Round We Go!
Fuel economy seems to be the biggest rave lately. We have
seen crazy ideas in the past few years, everything from low rolling resistance
tires to a hybrid Porsche! (Porsche 918 Spyder for those curious individuals
out there) There's even been studies conducted that shows you would save more
gas using the A/C instead of opening the windows once you exceed 80 km/h (about
50 MPH) due to wind resistance.
Going back to low rolling resistance tires though, are they
really worth the extra dollars? If you look at my chart below, the Michelin
Energy Saver All-seasons cost a whopping $230 more than the regular
OEM-equivalent replacement all-season tires - Bridgestone Insignia SE200's. For the
purposes of comparison in this article, we will be looking at the prices from
Canadian Costco only. The MPG figures are based on a 2009 Toyota Prius, fuel
economy data were grabbed from a report on Tirerack.com (a reputable online
retailer of tires and car parts/products based in the USA, link below). I have
made my best guess for the missing numbers based on the Tire Rack numbers,
these estimated figures are denoted with a "?" after the number.
The short answer is, yes the low rolling resistance tires do
offer you enough of a benefit to offset the extra costs in purchasing the
tires. Performance of these low resistance tires is also not a problem because the
difference won't be noticeable if your driving is not too "spirited".
It's been said that the earlier generations of low resistance tires encountered
poor wet surface performance, based on the reviews and articles on Tire Rack it
seems to have been fixed in later editions of low resistance tires.
Here's the chart from my calculations based on the prices
($CDN) from Costco and the test data from Tire Rack:
Please be aware that the last two rows are regular
all-season tires, the first three rows are the low rolling resistance tires. The
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 is a summer low resistance tire, and the EP422 is the
all-season version. The Bridgestone Insignia SE200 is the tire I used for base
comparison, since it is a regular all-season tire just like the Goodyear
Integrity I have assumed the MPG figures for those two will be the same if not
very similar. I had to use the Insignia tires for my calculations because
unfortunately Costco in Canada doesn't carry the Goodyear's. Ideally I would've
used the Goodyear for my calculations because that's the tire used in the Tire
Rack tests.
Focusing on the last two columns in my chart – highlighted
in green, you will see that the fuel savings over five years far exceeds the
extra costs for the tires. The time frame of five years was chosen because
either one of two things will happen: 1) the treads are worn, or 2) the rubber is
near the end of its useful life and large cracks are presents.
Wait! These fuel consumption numbers are from a Prius, will
it apply to other cars?
You can use the same calculations but make sure you keep the
ratios the same. So in here we see that the Michelin's fuel consumption is 0.892
times of the regular Bridgestone Insignia all-seasons, use that same factor for
your car's current fuel economy data (e.g. 7.5 L/100KM) and recalculate the
litres per year and dollar amounts. The conclusion should be the same and
actually, the less fuel efficient your car is compared to a Prius, the bigger
the net savings you should realize because the price of the low resistance
tires are fixed but the fuel savings will grow with fuel consumption. Don't believe me? See the chart
below. The fuel consumption numbers highlighted in yellow are the extrapolated numbers. Now the ratio method of extrapolating data isn't as accurate as real test
data done with your car but you likely won't find data specific to your car
online, this is the most logical method given the constraints of information.
Well there you have it folks, get low rolling resistance
tires the next time you replace your tires!
Tire Rack test figures: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/testDisplay.jsp?ttid=121
Have a wonderful weekend everyone, sorry I haven't been able
to update this blog as frequently...things have been quite busy lately.
-TT
Sunday, July 7, 2013
Is Early Retirement Possible?
Early
retirement, who wouldn't want that! Here's an article I just read from the
Financial Post:
This
family of five wants to retire by age 35, quite an aggressive goal. It's highly
improbable given the sacrifices they have to make on their quality of life, but
I guess if you're disciplined enough it could be possible. Moral of the story
is, cut back on unnecessary expenses and save every penny! Oh and of course,
start early...as early as you can and let the power of compounding work for
you. Now I am not suggesting you forgo your beers folks, woah woah woah let's
not go overboard here but instead of kicking back a few pints at a pub, why not
drink at home instead? Bottled beer may not taste as good as tap but it sure
isn't watered down like in most pubs nowadays, and it's cheaper than going out
for drinks.
For fun,
I have quickly put together a rough estimate of what you can expect to save up
between you and your partner living under the same roof for 21 years. Yes
yes...I know, it's the year 2013 and relationships might not last that long...but I assume you will find another partner at some point. Note that because
these are rough figures, I didn't take into account the fact that you may need
to buy replacement vehicles within the 21 years. Instead of breaking out the
major maintenance items for the cars, I just lumped those costs into the row
called "discretionary/misc". Also, be advised that I have made an
assumption that both you and your partner would've saved enough to afford the
down payment on the mortgage by age 24. Based on what I have saved up so far
and it's just me alone, it is definitely possible!
Looking
at this chart, it certainly seems possible you can retire between age 40 to age
50. It would probably be closer to age 50 if you factor in the cost of having
children, and the cost of replacement vehicles during those years. The mortgage
would've been mostly paid off at that point and with half a $million
per person, combined with post-retirement investments on that $500k, your CPP,
and company pension plans (if applicable) it is definitely doable. If you choose to have children and they
turn out to be somewhat successful in their lives, you might not even need to
put away that much for retirement!
Bottom line is, for an early retirement to be possible it is necessary to be disciplined when it comes to saving. Keep track of your expenses and make a plan to save, don't just save whatever is leftover, make saving a priority as oppose to a "catch-all category". Tell yourself you need to save $ X each month and use calculations to forecast your retirement savings. It's never too early to start retirement saving!
-TT
Monday, July 1, 2013
That Time Of The Year Again!
Now that it's moving season, I figure this should be an
appropriate time for this article! Just finished post-secondary and accepted a
job offer? Dying to move out and become independent? Being able to live in a "nag-free"
environment and having personal space is probably the dream of most new graduates,
but is it wise and is it doable? – That's where a lot of them fail to consider
thoroughly. I have actually encountered at least one person who had to move
back home after her one year lease because she realized she could not afford
it. She even took on a second job to help pay for everything.
Here are some "hidden" costs that may seem obvious to some but sometimes not considered:
- Cost of having your own car instead of using your parents'
car, paying for your own gas, monthly parking space charges at the condo you
are renting, and expenses related to maintenance. Surprisingly a lot of rental
units do not come with parking, the landlord rents it out to other residents that
require an additional space. You might end up renting the condo unit from one
landlord and renting a parking space from another owner.
- Additional food costs, due to A) not having your parents cook for you or fill the fridge with groceries, and B) you will be working a lot and so you can expect to order takeout more frequently.
- Shared utilities cost: you will now be paying for your own internet and cable most likely, hydro bill on the other hand will probably be covered by your landlord depending on who you rent from. Cable bill may not be that big of an issue since a lot of us stream or watch TV online.
So the above list should help in identifying whether it's
doable, you will have to run some numbers for the condo you plan on renting.
Now is it wise to move out right away? To be on the safe side, it may be safer
to accumulate a sum of cash before moving out. You would then invest this cash
while using it as a safety net in case anything unexpected happens, eg. your car
might need repairs. There's a general rule of thumb, you should have enough
cash to cover 6-months of expenses as a safety net. Depending on how risk
averse you are, you could add to that time period of course. In fact, I believe
you should have enough cash to cover all your expenses for as long as you will
need to take to find another job in case this one fails. This means that it could be longer than 6 months depending on your career field.
Side note: Did you move at least 40km closer to your new
employment location? You may be eligible to deduct moving expenses against your
income for Canadian tax purposes. More information on what expenses are eligible can be found here:
Happy Canada Day folks!
-TT
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






